| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 |
101. Sticky:[Discussion] Entosis Link Tactics and Ship Balance - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
M1k3y Koontz wrote: Promiscuous Female wrote: M1k3y Koontz wrote: https://i.imgur.com/dZoUBJK.jpg
45 DPS at 124km, your interceptor is dead in under a minute (55.5 seconds, yes I did the math) It's also a fifth the cost. Your mo...
- by Promiscuous Female - at 2015.03.09 22:19:05
|
102. Sticky:[Discussion] Entosis Link Tactics and Ship Balance - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Veskrashen wrote: Since the only significant advantage they have over cloaky nullfiied T3s is their <=2sec align time this just in signature radius and speed are not significant or advantages
- by Promiscuous Female - at 2015.03.09 22:17:32
|
103. Sticky:[Discussion] Entosis Link Tactics and Ship Balance - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Acuma wrote: Promiscuous Female wrote: Acuma wrote: EvilweaselFinance wrote: Acuma wrote: Again.....don't be dense. They asked for feedback and they are going to make adjustments.....that's a given. I never said the link "resets" I ...
- by Promiscuous Female - at 2015.03.09 22:16:38
|
104. Sticky:[Discussion] Entosis Link Tactics and Ship Balance - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Acuma wrote: EvilweaselFinance wrote: Acuma wrote: Again.....don't be dense. They asked for feedback and they are going to make adjustments.....that's a given. I never said the link "resets" I said it cancels you out so you run away in yo...
- by Promiscuous Female - at 2015.03.09 22:11:53
|
105. Sticky:[Discussion] Entosis Link Tactics and Ship Balance - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
God's Apples wrote: I really don't see how inties are a problem. One info linked maulus/keres/celestis prevents at least 3 ships from locking anywhere past linked FN web huginn/rapier web range. Even if the inty or t3 dessy or whatever had 250k...
- by Promiscuous Female - at 2015.03.09 22:09:23
|
106. Sticky:[Discussion] Entosis Link Tactics and Ship Balance - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Acuma wrote: they are going to make adjustments [citation needed]
- by Promiscuous Female - at 2015.03.09 22:08:17
|
107. Sticky:[Discussion] Entosis Link Tactics and Ship Balance - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Acuma wrote: Really? And as has been discussed in other threads, that will probably be adjusted. Don't be dense. A heavily occupied system will probably end up near the top, and the defending force is going to know how much time they have.........
- by Promiscuous Female - at 2015.03.09 22:03:13
|
108. Sticky:[Discussion] Entosis Link Tactics and Ship Balance - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
John McCreedy wrote: davet517 wrote: You get a notice if your sov's being attacked. The whole point of this is to live in the systems that you claim. Don't live there, don't claim it. If you do live there, you don't need to camp because of ...
- by Promiscuous Female - at 2015.03.09 21:55:24
|
109. Sticky:[Discussion] Entosis Link Tactics and Ship Balance - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Acuma wrote: Promiscuous Female wrote: Acuma wrote: Your objective is to spend 20-30 minutes in an active system to waste about 2-4 minutes of the defender and nothing else? Have fun with that.....I will enjoy the countless man hours wast...
- by Promiscuous Female - at 2015.03.09 21:54:19
|
110. Sticky:[Discussion] Entosis Link Tactics and Ship Balance - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
EvilweaselFinance wrote: MASSADEATH wrote: Yes!!! and guess what.... we already have the whole cloaky alt thing in place !!!! :) odd, our ratting indexes are still at V guess the cloaky alt thing doesn't work too well :v: they'd have ...
- by Promiscuous Female - at 2015.03.09 21:53:21
|
111. Sticky:[Discussion] Entosis Link Tactics and Ship Balance - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
PotatoOverdose wrote: Ranger 1 wrote: The only real disadvantage is being inflicted on sov holders with more systems than they can cover... everybody else is just fine., thanks. Sorting this thread by alliance.... http://eve-search.com/s...
- by Promiscuous Female - at 2015.03.09 21:49:03
|
112. Sticky:[Discussion] Entosis Link Tactics and Ship Balance - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
be honest now
- by Promiscuous Female - at 2015.03.09 21:46:42
|
113. Sticky:[Discussion] Entosis Link Tactics and Ship Balance - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
massadeath what do you hate more, goons or red killboards
- by Promiscuous Female - at 2015.03.09 21:45:55
|
114. Sticky:[Discussion] Entosis Link Tactics and Ship Balance - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
MASSADEATH wrote: perhaps the logistical might of the mighty goons should improve more of these ratting systems then.so they can be better defended with higher indices :) cta red pen mining op
- by Promiscuous Female - at 2015.03.09 21:44:21
|
115. Sticky:[Discussion] Entosis Link Tactics and Ship Balance - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Erasmus Grant wrote: Guess the one or two post I made suggesting that Battle-cruisers should be the smallest ship that can fit an E-Link is too vocal. Guess I will no longer give feedback anymore. realtalk, this is a travesty if ccp would ac...
- by Promiscuous Female - at 2015.03.09 21:34:30
|
116. Sticky:[Discussion] Entosis Link Tactics and Ship Balance - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
i do like how the conversation has morphed into an excruciating exploration of whose time is more wasted this is surely relevant to the point that interceptors can do what they do without risking death
- by Promiscuous Female - at 2015.03.09 21:33:04
|
117. Sticky:[Discussion] Entosis Link Tactics and Ship Balance - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Eli Apol wrote: Promiscuous Female wrote: some people need to have things repeated to them in order to understand them some more than others i guess One last bite. 40 minute capture time. 10 minute to undo that capture. How many warps ...
- by Promiscuous Female - at 2015.03.09 21:30:53
|
118. Sticky:[Discussion] Entosis Link Tactics and Ship Balance - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
SilentAsTheGrave wrote: And when someone else is already at your new destination ready to send your precious interceptors back to the Stone Age? Or when you start losing sov because you felt contesting sov on the other side of the map was more...
- by Promiscuous Female - at 2015.03.09 21:28:24
|
119. Sticky:[Discussion] Entosis Link Tactics and Ship Balance - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Alavaria Fera wrote: No, they won't stop posting, only disengage and move to another set of goalposts :vince:
- by Promiscuous Female - at 2015.03.09 21:25:19
|
120. Sticky:[Discussion] Entosis Link Tactics and Ship Balance - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Eli Apol wrote: Promiscuous Female wrote: Eli Apol wrote: Promiscuous Female wrote: nah i'll reiterate it since you are slow interceptor warp speed > maulus warp speed defender cap speed > attacker cap speed disengage and...
- by Promiscuous Female - at 2015.03.09 21:24:28
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |